Hyderabad: The Telangana Top Courtroom faulted the government for stating a work of land as city land ceiling surplus land after striking up notices below the ULC Act, in opposition to an individual who used to be lengthy useless.  

The courtroom questioned how the officers may start up ULC lawsuits in 1998 when the landlord had died in 1983. Additionally, with out issuing any enquiry realize to an and affected birthday celebration, who had bought the mentioned land in 1980 from the deceased particular person and is continuous bodily ownership until date, which is in opposition to the provisions of the ULC Act.

The department bench comprising Leader Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar upheld the only pass judgement on order, which put aside the ULC lawsuits over the admeasuring 13 acres in Survey. No. 60 and 3 acres and 7 guntas in Survey No. 62 of Chengicherla in Ghatkesar mandal.

When an individual used to be in bodily ownership and that he used to be now not disposed at any level of time through anybody a lot much less the ULC government, how can the government point out that the land used to be taken over through finishing the panchanama, the bench puzzled.

One A. Narayan Reddy, proprietor of the land, had bought the it in 1980 to at least one R. Kamalakar Reddy. In 1983, Narayana Reddy died. Round 1998 his felony heirs disputed the sale transaction made in 1980 between their deceased father and Kamalakar Reddy.

Because the dispute used to be pending adjudication, City Land Ceiling government issued a gazette notification, pointing out that the land used to be surplus land and discussed that the valuables used to be taken over for ownership.

On coming to grasp of ULC lawsuits, Kamalakar Reddy approached the government. On now not getting reduction from there, he approached the Top Courtroom.

 

…